“The art classes have
allowed me to see other ways of existing on the planet – like the art teacher
says – that are faithful to principles that enable me to establish
relationships of respect and harmony with all the beings that surround me.”
Laura
Restrepo laurilla
This initiative was selected because it showcases how
educational activities of an interdisciplinary nature–in this case, tying art
in with ecology and the media–can generate new learning and foster in children,
young people, and young adults an awareness of their bodies and environments
and can also influence their ability to gain self-awareness of their particular
realities.
Promoting an educational experience geared toward
reasserting the place of human beings as part of the universe, taking advantage
of new technologies and the media, offers the possibility of building their
capacities to learn from and assimilate their environment.
Through this, the initiative fosters responsibility
and the capacity for change in children, young people, and young adults.
This experience also reflects the leading role played
by teachers in the creation of experiences with a significant impact throughout
the school system.
GOALS SOUGHT
This goal is in line with the principles of what is
known as “human ecology,” the new proposal for 21st-century citizens
that offers a new perspective for understanding humans and their communities
vis-à-vis the ecosystem.
WHAT IT INVOLVES
The initiative promotes interest in everyday
existence, in the actions, thoughts, and feelings of every day, which are
revealed in how people relate to biophysical systems–in other words, with the
physical principles that underlie all the processes of those systems where life
is found–from an ethical perspective, and leading to a fundamental
transformation in people’s thoughts, perceptions, and appreciations.
Intervention takes place through a workshop that
identifies materials and practices with which the participants feel
comfortable. This workshop creates a space in which the students can express
themselves through different artistic media and the languages of information
and communication (ICT) (without the separation generally seen in
differentiated disciplines), thereby fostering a dialogue between school, city,
and culture.
“Ecolmaginario” is an initiative that acts on the
basis of interactions between three areas of knowledge–ecology, the arts, and
technology–to enable access to different forms of expression that encourage the
implementation of ideas, intentions, and/or results, as well as of other
proposals that arise within and from the different agents involved.
TARGET AUDIENCE
It takes place in Medellín’s 13th commune,
in the context of a community with a high level of marginalization and with the
presence of armed actors, conflicts, and social tensions.
Although the initiative began as a classroom project
with youngsters of the 8th to 10th grades, it soon
evolved into an institutional project that covers preschool and primary up to
high school.
In 2009, the initiative
served two thousand, two hundred and fifty-seven (2,257) children and young
people; in 2010, two thousand, one hundred and twelve (2,112); and in 2011, one
thousand, nine hundred and eighty-seven (1,987). Outside institutions have also
participated every year.
The initiative also involves parents and local
residents.
“Being a part of this
initiative has allowed me to understand that in spite of my very difficult
situation, particularly in money terms, I can see an option that is different
from what my family or even this neighborhood can offer me.”
Juliana Gómez
ACHIEVEMENTS
Through this initiative, the students have increased
their abilities to reflect and assume ownership of their context, history, and
reality, and to understand the nature of human beings and their relations with
the environments and ecosystems of which they are a part. It has also brought
about changes in reading vis-à-vis ways of acting, thinking, and appreciating
the environment, in permanent connection with information and the mass media.
Thus, the initiative allows the participants to
construct an experience that is then reflected in their actions in the family,
school, and community arenas.
COMMUNITY
PARTICIPATION
According to the initiative’s nominator, “Describing the participation methodology is
somewhat complex, because it would have to include details of the different
mechanisms used to serve a population that is highly heterogeneous as regards
their beliefs, ideologies, and, consequently, forms of behavior (phenomenon of
displacement and establishment); in addition, because of the conflicts and
adversity they have experienced, they belong to a family and local context that
has smothered the creative spirit.”
However, it should be noted that every step of the
initiative provides for that situation. This can be seen in its design, which
is structured around four stages: motivation – development – execution –
evaluation. The motivation stage is led by teachers from the generating areas,
as the subjects where the initiative commences are known, and the students are
invited to detect the possible causes of a given set of problems affecting the
community (diagnosis). Although the
generating area is that of artistic and cultural education, other subjects are
also involved, such as environmental support, physical education, and
technology, in addition to other complementary areas in the applied sciences,
language science, ethics, and religion.
The development stage is led by the support areas and
the student leaders (Chikas Lolistas). At this stage, roles and functions are
planned, distributed, and assigned depending on the capacities, skills, and
talents of the parents, students, and teachers.
At the execution stage, when the youngsters’ material
and immaterial productions are realized – in other words, as either producers
or spectators – there is a mobilization of actions that seek to take
appreciation to a higher level, with the subject’s creative procedure (art,
ecology, and communication) the starting point for overcoming his or her own
contingencies.
The final stage is that of evaluation, which is
conducted in three different scenarios.
A summary of how the initiative is structured is
presented in the data-sheet provided by the nominator:
Generating area of the initiative (artistic and cultural ed.)
Luz Elena Acevedo
Support areas (environmental ed., physical/sports ed., and technology and informatics)
Luis Fernando Cárdenas, Lisiria Santa, Astrid Elena Moncada (B.P.), and
Edner Prado
Complementary areas (applied sciences, human science, language science, ethics and religion)
Aisnardy Soto, Aida Zapata, Margarita Restrepo, and Margarita Vélez
Chikas Lolistas (group of students who lead the initiative)
Logistics officers
Environmental leaders
Representative of each group and liaison to ensure that the information
is clear, relevant, and above all, internalized constantly in the classroom.
Coordinators
Scheduling and location of activities
Principal
Resources and permits
Parents
Involved at the level of what has been called “arts and professions”
Students and community in general
Material and immaterial production according to the topic proposed for
the year and to the allocation of roles and functions, which underscore the
applicability of the learning and, consequently, the securing of achievements.
TEACHERS’ PROFILE
The profile of the teachers involved in the initiative
is interdisciplinary, although they all have specialties related to the
subjects taught.
The experience’s nominator is an art-education
teacher, but since the initiative entails interaction with other subjects,
science and technology teachers are also involved (see data-sheet, previous
section).
EVALUATION
The evaluation is educational in nature and was
designed on the basis of identifying shared skills in all the areas and
subjects; these, in turn, are based on the crosscutting axes established for
the initiative: communication, information technologies, and the principle of
human ecology.
Because of this, an appraisal is detected not only of
the progress made by students in their overall development, but also of the
involvement of different educational actors in a committed and dynamic way.
The parents, teachers, leaders, and the institution
itself play a leading role in the evaluation processes of the students and in
assisting them in attaining basic skills. This task is carried out with
specific emphasis on the idea that emotion and reason are not antagonistic.
RISKS
According to the nominator, one of the identified risks
relates to the human factor, in that it is necessary to promote awareness to
give priority to initiatives of this kind within a context dominated by a
culture that prefers addressing consequences over prevention; this phenomenon
has affected the growth of the initiative in other schools. Similarly, economic
factors could also pose a risk to the initiative.
Drop-out rates at schools and other institutions is
another social risk that could affect students’ continuity in the experience;
one of the main causes of this is social conflict.
INVESTMENT AND FINANCING
According to the nominator, since it is a public
institution, the estimated amount for executing this initiative is relative: because of its nature, it must preserve the
available resources to the greatest extent it can. The reutilization principle
is applied to this amount, as are the donations and investments made by the
students and parents themselves. At the last count, the funds received totaled
nine hundred (900) U.S. dollars per year.
FUTURE PLANS
After the accumulated experience of five years, the
priority for the future is to create stimulating spaces at the collective level
that encourage student participation, making use of technology and information
and communications media to establish themselves as genuine communities with
their own identities and sense of belonging.
For that reason the experience emphasizes the
importance of the phrase “Work in Progress,” which offers the possibility of
understanding that initiatives and projects are not an end in themselves but,
instead, are a way to think and rethink the value judgments on which “truth” is
built. For that reason, a dialogue was opened with various art teachers
involved with leadership and empowerment projects regarding a proposal for
recording the impact of all those initiatives within a context, where art or
artistic activities are validated as a crosscutting axis for the transformation
of a world view, an institution, or a context.
PERSON IN CHARGE: Luz Elena Acevedo Lopera,
Teacher in artistic and cultural education. I.E. Lola González (PUBLIC LOCAL-AREA INSTITUTION). luzelenaacevedolopera@yahoo.com

No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario